20
Sep
Thursday – L93, Gas Inventories + Plays In China And Canada
- Crude Closed Up $0.43 to $81.93 on a last minute push for $82. It's up another 30 or so cents early. Weak dollar plus tightness concerns. I still think this cools in the next week or so back into the mid $70s.
- Natural Gas Tumbled $0.39 to $6.18 yesterday. It's off a nickel to a dime this morning as L93 so far looks to be a pretty benign disturbance. That could change quickly. See Tropics Watch below for more. Gas will have some round number support at $6 but if we break that I think we could be in for a dip to around $5.80. Storage takes a back seat to the weather today but an injection over 75 Bcf would like cause a $6 test.
- The Street: 60 to 70 Bcf Injection. They've been pretty dead on of late.
- My Number: 75 Bcf. How's that for wishy washy? No really, that's what I'm thinking and it will drive us into a small YoY storage deficit but honestly what happens with L93 (see next Tropics watch) is much more important for gas prices right now unless it fails to strengthen.
- Cooling degree days tumbled from 69 in the preceding week to 45 for this reporting period. That's more like it for the shoulder season
- Imports were off by about 1 Bcfgpd week to week.
With the above factors in mind I'd say the over under for gas is probably 65 Bcf with a smaller number yielding a rally. I think the chance of a number than last week's is unlikely given the amount of demand sapping rainfall and the cool snap we experienced during the period. The impact of a pipeline snafu in the Rockies however could trump the ability of producers to get gas into storage and could potentially put a cap on this week's number close to my level.
- What Goes Up Watch : Chinese Oils: PTR, SNP Between A Rock And A Hard Place. These stocks have been on fire with oil prices. Despite the rise in prices Beijing is keeping oil products prices flat with levels last altered in January (at that was to drop them) in an attempt to curb rampant inflation.
- The statement on the National Development and Reform Commission: The Chinese Government won't allow any new price changes for the rest of the year. "Any unauthorized price rise is strictly forbidden." Comment: One giant leap backwards for Chinese Capitalism.
- According to Dow Jones, China has not allowed any increases in retail gas prices in 16 months. SNP said they are expecting cracks of -$5.00 in 3q07, down from a loss of $0.40 per barrel in the second quarter.
- PTR represents about 40% of China's refining capacity, SNP is slightly larger so the two together make up the lions share of mainland China's capacity and as such will bear the brunt of the China's forced losses.
- The two had increased exports to help offset some of the losses earlier this year (they can sell to foreigners at world prices) but in August China reported domestic shortages were increasing and some imports of gasoline were seen. The Chinese government is increasing pressure on the domestic refiners to keep their product in country and thus forcing them to take the hit. SNP has already said it will not be cutting capacity in the face of the price freeze.
- Numbers: Estimates are just starting to fall for (SNP) and (PTR) for the current quarter.
- I'll be looking at puts on both companies and I while I would expect them to drop on last night's news I plan to scale in early and small. As you can see from the table above, the rally they've had has been a strong one and that's just over the last month.
- Buffet announced another slight trimming of his PTR shares in a move related investor/pension fund sentiment towards the company and not (that we know of) due to the recent poor refining performance.
- (PTR) is planning to offer 4 Billion class A shares.
- Alberta Royalties: the proposal is for increasing after payout royalties from 25% to 33% AND introducing a sliding scale severance tax on bitumen (1% rate when WTI is $40 moving up to 9% when oil is at or above $120). This would kind of take the fun out of owning stocks like (SU), (CNQ), (PCZ), (NXY), (SYN.t), (WTO.t) and even (ECA) and surely puts a damper on development stage outfits like (BQI). Comment: Chavez for prez! Analysts are wasting no time in downgrade several of these names. All of the US listed stocks all carry options, even the little squirt so we'll see if we can do a little target practice after the open.
- Production: Minor Bump Despite Drop In Utilization. People like Flynn will say, "see, utilization is falling, buy gasoline." I say gasoline in storage is low but production is pretty robust for this time of year. Week over week U.S. refineries produced an additional 96,000 bopd despite the drop in production. One reason: higher prices. I think RBOB prices will retreat when crude does creating an opportunity to pick up some refining calls that will bounce once utilization really starts cracking lower and blending can't offset all the maintenance downtime.
- Imports were flat last week (very slightly down) at just over a million bpd.
- Demand: Slipping seasonally. Demand fell by just under a 150,000 bpd week to week and was in line with last year's levels and not running ahead by the 1 to 2.5 YoY gains we saw in early summer.
- Stocks: Pretty Dire. The EIA's Inventory Chart Speaks For Itself:
- (RIG). Sold the last half of the my $105 Calls at$5.40 for a 200% gain. Will revisit this story on the long side soon after we get the first major sell off in broader and/or energy market which I expect to come soon.
- (TSO) Sold out of my September $50 calls for $0.60 (a 59% loss) upon seeing the inventory report. Glad I did as they ended the day bid $0.10.
- (UNG): Yes I'm still holding my UNG $39 puts. If the storm looks like it's going to be a real problem I'll toss them for the loss but natural gas has been backing off exactly like I thought when I entered this trade last Thursday. Besides, if L93 turns into something at least I have a double does of (OII) Calls (September and October) to console my self with.
- (ESV) picked up the October $55s to add to my existing and somewhat kicked in the head October $50s (hey, there aren't a lot of puts that aren't that were bought pre-Ben's 50 point firesale on US debt). Anyway, instead of double or triple the original position which has gotten well out of the money in the span of 3 days, I set my sights on the next higher strike while still holding the original $50s. I'm fairly confident that between now and the end of the 3rd week of October there will be a day or two where everyone hates energy, can't believe they own it and dump the stocks willy-nilly. That'll be may cue to exit the $50s, even for a loss while the then, assumedly in the money $55s will get me out of the dog house. The reasons for going into the position have not changed and estimates continue to come down...I say it's cheap for a reason.
NG down 22 to 5.96
September 20th, 2007 at 7:00 amHO off a penny at 2.233
oil hanging on to slight gain at 82.07
NG at 5.89, down 29
Crude off and below 82
Smith Barney and Citi upgrades CNQ citing recent sell off which might give a nice entry on a put play. Note to the two analysts, a one day 4 point dip is not a sell off on a stock that is up over 50% ytd
September 20th, 2007 at 7:34 amZman, what kind of impact might this row about the royalty tax hike in Albert have on E&P companies?
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=6bc99b36-9bce-4bc9-87b0-eb163db931a0&k=48755
September 20th, 2007 at 7:35 amZman,
Having no dsl service since fri a.m. (thanks/later earthlink)has made it tough for me to keep up here. the APA oct 80s are only my second pass down the zeb wave – WOAH! are we still holding?
September 20th, 2007 at 7:36 ame – I look at it from an oil sands standpoint in today’s post as they have a higher cost load to worry about but it’s definitely not good.
September 20th, 2007 at 7:37 amI’ll look before I leap next time. Thx.
September 20th, 2007 at 7:39 amRKbos – yep although I came close to punting yesterday and may today. On the one hand they are Octobers so you’ve got time, on the other hand, they’re up 240% on the bid side in 10 days.
September 20th, 2007 at 7:39 amE – No, it’s a good thought, the biggest E&P with oil sands and drilling that would be negatively impacted on the list is NXY.
I’m liking the two upgrades on CNQ as an entry point. Think it’ll pump it early a maybe for a day or two but then negative sentiment takes em all lower. I’ll do a little value work to make sure it’s not ridiculously cheap.
September 20th, 2007 at 7:41 amNG consensus is now 66 Bcf and the range has spread out to 53 to 75. I’m on the top end of that.
September 20th, 2007 at 7:43 amWhoever is sending out your alerts to the hoi polloi should stop – this is diluting the trades of everyone who pays for them. What the heck kind of a trader gives away his trades anyway, or is it after they have entered the position, turning it into a pump? I do not play with options lately, and have not traded off your blasts – however you are tempting me.
No selling pressure on the canucks that I see yet. Penn West and Harvest are up in the pre-market. The legislation is not a sure thing, although the PM is getting macho and promises not to back down – so something is going to happen, though maybe not at the high end like he wants. Now that I know you are going to be shorting my positions – I better clear out before that train rolls over me! Or maybe I’ll just wait for the dip to wet my beak a little and hit the longs side. I never thought it would come to this between us!
September 20th, 2007 at 7:43 amSo today’s big plays are negative Canada oil sands and negative on China. Both pretty risky but they’ve had a great run.
September 20th, 2007 at 7:48 am3:02 AM EST
Crude Tad Down, Supported By Supply Concerns
Dow Jones Newswires
SINGAPORE — Benchmark crude oil futures prices slipped Thursday in Asian trading, as some traders pocketed profits after prices hit new record highs overnight.
Yet concerns about tight supply firmly supported prices.
“This may be just a correction, and those who have opened shorts could have a hard time later,” said Rikio Ishikura, a broker at Fimat Japan.
At 0635 GMT, the October crude oil futures contract on the New York Mercantile Exchange was down 3 cents a barrel to $81.90 a barrel.
October Nymex heating oil lost 40 points to trade at 224.13 a gallon, while October Nymex gasoline was up 42 points at 209.76 a gallon.
The November contract for Brent crude on London’s ICE exchange fell 27 cents a barrel to $78.20 a barrel.
Crude oil prices in New York settled at a new record high overnight after U.S. government data showed crude stockpiles last week fell by more than expected.
The U.S. Department of Energy said crude stockpiles fell by 3.8 million barrels to 318.8 million barrels last week, larger than analysts’ expectations of a 1.5-million-barrel fall.
It was the 10th fall in 11 weeks for U.S. crude stocks, which have declined 10% during the period, according to DOE figures. Stockpiles at Cushing, Oklahoma, the delivery point for Nymex crude futures, fell 1.7 million barrels to 18.3 million barrels, the lowest level since December 2005.
Eyes were also on the possible formation of another hurricane near the U.S., which could lead to production outages and push up oil prices.
The National Hurricane Center said Wednesday that a disturbance off Florida that is likely to move into the Gulf of Mexico could develop into a hurricane.
If this doesn’t lead to a substantial output disruption, oil prices may undergo corrections in the near term.
“Our feeling is that the market is particularly vulnerable to a significant price correction if the weather risk begins to fade again,” analysts at MF Global said in a daily note to clients.
—By Jun Yang, Dow Jones Newswires
September 20th, 2007 at 7:49 amForgot – the loon is parity now.
September 20th, 2007 at 7:59 amZ – BQI is in Saskatchewan, not Alberta. So IF the Alberta pushes through the tax/royalty increase, more investment would go to Saskatchewan. They want the production, because they are alot poorer.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:00 amThanks Sambone…see what a little bit of knowledge will get you? trouble.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:04 amIf I was going to play the sands short, i’d hedge a bit in with a diversified producer. Also Energy Alberta put in for two uranium reactor permit today, ostensibly to heat the gunk. 2007 and we are still building out nukes and gunk – I never would have thought.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:05 amI’m looking at the big 4 right now:
SU, CNQ, PCZ, ECA
PCZ press releasing an increase in working interest to one of its Alberta projects today.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:07 amTrue, there are several names with sizable Saska production, which is tilted toward black gup anyway, rather than gassy. Alberta just helped BC and Saska.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:07 amBeen thinking about Canada-I am a novice but aren’t a lot of these trusts held by yield loving retiree’s? After the halloween surprise the move out continued for some time. Also wouldn’t it benfit our domestic energy reit’s?
September 20th, 2007 at 8:10 amAlso at the margin another support for Ng?
Any thoughts anyone?
SU and CNQ seem to be the two big standouts on tall valuations here and analysts are looking for something like 10% haircuts to forward earnings.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:12 amTar is $40 to recover. What made the tar merchants so inviting was that hedgies decided to play musical chairs and pile in. You know what happens to the last one out – since you can get in with lower valuations with people whose recovery costs are half.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:16 amPTR –
They’re offering another 4 Billion shares
Buffett continues to ease off his load.
Estimates are falling
Refining margins there stink
They’re up 30% in as many days
They’re rallying again this morning on oil
September 20th, 2007 at 8:17 amWhoa – this is the sort of moves one sees in equity – 1.5% in one day for the loon!!!
September 20th, 2007 at 8:23 amDenise – Definitely yes to your first and third questions? I’m not sure how much of an impact as far as your second but potential the MLPs and Royalty Trusts like SJT would benefit some but more I think from gas price support than from a shift of investors from north to south of the border. Just my 2 cents.
NG retook 6 for a moment.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:23 amDidn’t the Chicoms just extend their price controls on gasoline and clamp down on exports?
September 20th, 2007 at 8:24 amCal – that’s what I wrote about in the post. Does anyone read the post?
September 20th, 2007 at 8:25 amI do
September 20th, 2007 at 8:25 amjust kidding Cal but I had a whole section on the chicoms today,.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:26 amCal, I also saw that Energy Alberta filed permits for 2 reactors.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:32 amIf they do go through with it, it could lower operating costs for tars who would be hooked into the loop.
PTR and SNP oblivious to the price controls story, run with up oil. Watching but both opening up about $3
September 20th, 2007 at 8:32 amSane – in 6 to 10 years
September 20th, 2007 at 8:33 amAny thoughts on oil if the Saudis stop using the dollar as their peg?
September 20th, 2007 at 8:34 amYeah not a short timeframe, but if they see steam is readily available for cheaper than nat generated steam, it might spur some more development of the sands which usually takes time.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:35 amBloomberg – “Saudi Arabia may drop its currency’s link to the dollar”
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601083&sid=akxbUYV16uVw&refer=currency
September 20th, 2007 at 8:36 amDenise – it’s been threatened for a long time and would take time but it’s well known OPEC has been casting off dollars for a long time now.
Venezuela says it just went to the Euro.
Don’t really know how to think about but I think it will take a long time to accomplish. Did you see a new story?
September 20th, 2007 at 8:36 amSane – why don’t they go geothermal? Just too much needed? Go down 12,000 feet in lots of places and you’ve got hot rocks. Water in one well bore, steam out the adjacent
September 20th, 2007 at 8:38 amThanks for the link Sambone, that story screams inflation to me.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:39 amOff subject – Is anybody seen what the 10 year Treas is doing today? Wow!
September 20th, 2007 at 8:41 amthe thirty year is off 0.82%, wow
September 20th, 2007 at 8:42 amZ, I completely agree about the geothermal, but I think that it has more to do with the temperature of the steam. Most geothermal is about 300F ( Unless you are in a geo hotspot ) whereas nuclear can run 700F or higher. I am a big supporter of geothermal, especially for electricity generation
September 20th, 2007 at 8:44 amSane – ok, right hot but not hot enough unless you happen to be on a thin spot.
Given well costs though there is no reason we don’t produce electricity en masse via closed loop systems. Talk about green. And the earth quakes it causes, very small. Seriously, there are some “kooks” out there working on this and I hope they get it working.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:47 amYeah it is like drilling an oil well with a 50 year life. Seems kinda tarded there is not more of a push for it.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:50 amTRADE: Put this one in the super risky category. SEPT PTR $155 puts for $0.45. This is a funny money only trade, based on the fundamental message in today’s post regarding price controls and other PTR news and my gut. Very small. I will likely lose all my dough on this one.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:50 amI think the big setback is the closed loop system on a large scale. Putting a large enough U-tube 12000 feet down is kinda tough, but doable.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:52 amz-For the first time they did not lower their rates in lockstep with ours.
September 20th, 2007 at 8:58 amSome (pretty smartpeople)are saying they will join other Middle East countries like Kuwait and that this is a sign.
z-ptr is restricted-might be kind of crowded
September 20th, 2007 at 8:59 amSane correct -geothermal not warm enough. It could be done with CSP and wind – if the desire was there. That would be a fiscal policy initiative, and we are in the throes of the monetarists now. The greenback says thanks monetarists.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:00 amDenise: restricted from mainlanders? sorry don’t follow.
Geo thermal – saw a professor on the science channel who’s done some test down to 15 that work well, problem with funding though. Could be a quack.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:02 amDenise – If Petro countries delink, run, don’t walk from US dollars. Gold, FXE, FXF, ect.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:02 amThis doesn’t look that bad when you look at the rain totals and the intensity and the tracks. All point to no damage to facilities, maybe a quick shut in or two but not really targeting the heart of production if it does go to NOLA. Winds not strong enough to damage much aside from dingy at this forecast.
http://www.crownweather.com/tropical.html#93L
September 20th, 2007 at 9:05 amSambone – you long the GLD?
September 20th, 2007 at 9:08 amSambone,
Yeah then big ben will have to really ramp up rates.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:09 amI am not long gold, however I do have an interest in ‘black gold’
September 20th, 2007 at 9:11 amI sold my black gold interest back in July (kick, kick, kick)
September 20th, 2007 at 9:12 amI like your trading focus, which keeps me from macroeconomic flights of fancy – however, would the future possibly be priced in energy units?
September 20th, 2007 at 9:14 amYea, I sold Southern Pacific in the spring myself – and then took a running kick at a fire hydrant.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:16 amCal – I try for a balance of both hence the company specific reports but I have been feeling a little trady of late, š
future priced in energy units or water
September 20th, 2007 at 9:16 amLong GLD, FXF, SKF (Getting my head handed to me), SJH, FXE for hedges.
This really scares me today.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:17 amhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml;jsessionid=4QWAEP3LANZTLQFIQMGCFFWAVCBQUIV0?xml=/money/2007/09/19/bcnsaudi119.xml
OT: anyone use any particular brand of flat panel swing arm they like?
September 20th, 2007 at 9:17 amNice call on ESV yesterday Z
September 20th, 2007 at 9:21 amKeep with the trady stuff – your heating oil call would get you your own desk at a trading house. BPG may be becoming interesting – I like the acreage – in case gas will ever be worth anything in the future
September 20th, 2007 at 9:22 amSambone – that does have a very high pucker factor. If Nicky weren’t playing tennis I’m sure she’d be echoing our comments from Tuesday: they’re going to regret that cut.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:25 amThis is ridiculous – hula Hank is on TV encouraging all taxpayers to call their lender before they default. Why don’t you go to the chicoms with your hand out again Hula, since you outsourced a couple of million jobs there with your pals
September 20th, 2007 at 9:25 am10:14 AM EST
Nymex Crude Pauses After Record Run-Up; Oct Expiry
By ANNA RAFF
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
NEW YORK — Crude oil’s latest run-up to record highs took a pause Thursday, but any correction is expected to be short-lived and shallow due to the belief that fourth-quarter demand will further strain tight petroleum supplies.
Light, sweet crude for October delivery was steady in early New York trade ahead of its expiry later in the day. The contract recently was 12 cents higher at $82.05 a barrel. The November contract was 21 cents lower at $80.64 on the New York Mercantile Exchange.
Crude oil has finished at all-time record highs for three days in a row after decisively breaching $80 a barrel for the first time last week. A confluence of factors have contributed to the price surge. Last week’s meeting of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries refocused the market’s attention on global supplies, which show no signs of slacking. U.S. inventories of crude oil and gasoline are declining, and stockpiles of heating oil are 13% below the five-year average ahead of the winter heating season. And storm activity has picked up in the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico late into hurricane season, creating a persistent threat to energy infrastructure.
The Nymex heating oil contract has hit record highs together with crude, but showed signs of softening Thursday. Nymex October heating oil was recently trading 93 points lower at $2.236 a gallon.
“Everything is a little bit soft today,” said Addison Armstrong, an analyst with TFS Energy Brokers in Stamford, Conn.
A disorganized system of thundershowers moving over Florida “doesn’t look like it’ll change much and won’t impact prices today,” Armstrong said. “We are going to have some pressure because of expiration of the October crude contract, and products weaker.”
While heating oil and crude rose partly on expectations of a cold winter that would drive demand, prices may reverse course in the midterm if traders pay heed to the latest weather forecasts. Most of the U.S. will likely see above-normal temperatures in October through December, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Thursday.
NOAA’s monthly update noted “increased change of above-normal temperatures over most of the United States. The only exceptions are along the Canadian border from Montana westward and in the Southeast along the South Atlantic coast,” NOAA said.
If other forecasts for a warmer-than-normal winter follow, it could weaken crude further, but the market feels confident in a solid floor of $74-$76 a barrel, said an energy trader, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
“The market rose too sharp, too fast with too little information,” the trader said. “There’s pressure to correct.”
Nymex October gasoline is trading 66 points higher at $2.100 a gallon. Interest in the contract has waned because the U.S. peak driving season has already passed.
—By Anna Raff, Dow Jones Newswires
September 20th, 2007 at 9:26 amDenver – almost makes up for the $50s I still hold but thanks.
Cal – I’m going to use that quote in the marketing packet, lol.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:26 amZ.
What’s your exit limit on the PTR spec
September 20th, 2007 at 9:28 amMorning all (just back from tennis Z! and catching up with the thread). #58 Samborne – that is very very frightening. Way to go Ben!! FWIW Dollar index should go to 40 over the next few years!!!!!!!
September 20th, 2007 at 9:29 amz-ptr no shares available to borrow for shorting-
September 20th, 2007 at 9:29 amNote October WTI is up but November down.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:30 amThanks Sambone, that NOAA forecast would lead me to think gas will be stuck in the $5.50 to $6.50 for awhile.
Q downside to 0 as its a bet. Upside, I’ll be happy with 25%+. Problem is oil won’t fall with the dollar getting car jacked on a daily basis. Maybe it will if people start listening to Greenspan’s consumer spending comments and that NOAA forecast which would loosen the expected tightness. Of course, it’s a 2 day bet so they have to wake up to reality pretty quick for me.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:30 am63 Bcf in line gas is down 12 at 6.05 at report
September 20th, 2007 at 9:31 amNicky’s buddy, PF
http://www.321energy.com/reports/flynn/current.html
September 20th, 2007 at 9:31 amDenise: I just do puts. Like to know that all I can lose is 100%. Although in the case of a $150 stock I guess you’d have to be in a coma to lose more than that.
Gas looks disappointed with the number, that’s odd but ok with my UNG puts. Gas 6.025
Morning Nicky!
September 20th, 2007 at 9:33 amNG starting to rally, down 9 cents now
September 20th, 2007 at 9:40 amtsx – nyse crosslisted shares now trading at parity – no more arbing that spread. it’s a strange sight on the screen though and has me confused.. don’t know which one is what.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:42 amDistillates and Brent as mentioned yesterday looked in need of one more leg up and so far we are not getting it! We are however getting another leg up in wti – both October and November now. It needs to go above 81.19 November and 82.50 in October and we haven’t quite made it yet.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:44 amBP, COP, Shell shutting production in the GOMEX
September 20th, 2007 at 9:44 amNat gas – looks to have completed iii of i of iii. So we are most likely in a iv retracement. Resistance is at 6.165, 6.256.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:47 amCal – LOL, very weird, kind of like when we went from fractions to decimals, messed me up for weeks.
Thanks Sambone, looks like shell is biggest as they’re shutting in ALL GOMEX, 370,000 boepd.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:47 amNicky, sorry if it’s a repeat ? from yesterday but what if we get through $6
September 20th, 2007 at 9:49 amI hope that turns my screen of red another color
September 20th, 2007 at 9:50 amThe fundamentals of our economy is strong, unemployment is low and the corporate sector looks like its in good shape – spoke the armadillo who never met a fiscal policy he did not hate.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:52 amSamborne – just get our tropical update on tv and all the computer models show this L93 staying east of New Orleans and pretty close to land. If that is the case there will be little impact on the rigs. Any thoughts?
September 20th, 2007 at 9:54 amZ – nat gas has traded as low as 5873 this morning. Needs another leg below this to finish i down. Until then it cannot be counted as impulsive and confirm the bearish case. At the moment we appear to be tracing out a small correction which is iv of i of iii.
Clear as mud I know!
September 20th, 2007 at 9:59 amWell, OII seems to like this potential storm.
September 20th, 2007 at 9:59 amNicky, no it’s helpful. Thanks.
September 20th, 2007 at 10:00 amgreen popping through, looks like a turn on the screen
September 20th, 2007 at 10:00 amN – Currently I just don’t think this system is going to do anything to the platforms, but remember Humberto.
September 20th, 2007 at 10:06 amHere is a rather large file on the platform locations in the GOMEX for future use.
September 20th, 2007 at 10:09 amhttp://www.gomr.mms.gov/homepg/lsesale/Visual1.pdf
NG slipping back down through $6
September 20th, 2007 at 10:10 amAPC just shut down
September 20th, 2007 at 10:16 amthanks, that’s another 145,000 boe pd. If I didn’t know better (LOL) I’d think the headlines were designed to rally prices. The APC one specifically mentioned their new Independence Hub, as if ALL production didn’t tell you that.
I guess they’ve started calling L93, tropical disturbance 50 now.
September 20th, 2007 at 10:19 amZMAN – PTR SEPT 155 PUTS – you wild man. Sounds good!
September 20th, 2007 at 10:23 amRam – THOSE AREN’T FOR YOU!
September 20th, 2007 at 10:23 amO.K.
September 20th, 2007 at 10:24 amIt looks to me like natural gas traders are looking through this minor disturbance and focusing on that warm 4Q weather forecast. Gas breaking down through 6 yet again.
September 20th, 2007 at 10:28 amBush says has no knowledge of Hunt Oil Deal with Iraq.
http://www.upi.com/International_Security/Energy/Briefing/2007/09/19/kucinich_wants_inquiry_into_hunt_iraq_oil/1707/
September 20th, 2007 at 10:33 amcanada tanking..
September 20th, 2007 at 10:38 amWhat the hell is going on in Canada I got two plays ENT and PDS and they sank like it was wet sand.
September 20th, 2007 at 11:21 am12:12 PM EST
Nymex Nov Crude Goes Positive; Storm In Background
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
From MARKET TALK:
[Dow Jones] Nymex crude is choppy and the second month is strengthening a bit as weather forecasts call for the disturbance to the west of Florida to stay over water for longer than originally expected. The longer a storm stays over warm water, the more likely it is to attain tropical storm or hurricane strength. The system “will not likely be important,” says Tim Evans of Citigroup. “We have seen some production shut in for precaution but it will not become a major storm. I don’t think the oil market is particularly focused on the storm. It’s a background story.” Nymex Oct crude, which expires Thu, +46c at $82.38/bbl. Nov turns positive, now +3c at $80.88. (anna.raff@dowjones.com)
Reported earlier:
September 20th, 2007 at 11:22 amENT stopped paying.
September 20th, 2007 at 11:23 amCal and WL – right and the US is acting like business as usually. Could it be Canadian products won’t sell so well with their dollar strength?
September 20th, 2007 at 11:24 amNat gas off 2.4%, UNG off 0.2%. I think I’ll just stick to the futures as this would have been a killer trade in that arena.
September 20th, 2007 at 11:31 amZ – You watching the bond mkt? Not sure I’ve seen this type of swing. Have you?
September 20th, 2007 at 11:32 amNo…and No but I don’t watch it that closely, doesn’t it do this every time a fed chairman testifies? š
September 20th, 2007 at 11:35 amwebloner,
re #99,you may have alerady read of/knew this –
from Rigzone:
Panel Calls for Oil Sands Royalties Hike
http://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=50382
September 20th, 2007 at 11:39 amScenario one keeping gas just over 6
http://www.accuweather.com/news-story.asp?partner=accuweather&traveler=0&article=2
September 20th, 2007 at 11:41 amSambone – you see that blob down by Honduras?
September 20th, 2007 at 11:46 amIt seems to be sinking into the markets that this is now going to be an inflationary problem. What does he do next when the markets tank anyway?
September 20th, 2007 at 11:50 amZ – Yup, but alot of shear. I’m more interested in the wave that just came off of Africa.
September 20th, 2007 at 11:57 amhttp://www.ssd.noaa.gov/met8/eatl/loop-rb.html
Nicky – All but the US markets you mean? Trading in US indexes looks dead, complacent, out to a very long lunch.
Sambone – Hear ya, Africa wave
September 20th, 2007 at 11:58 amoil making yet another run quietly higher, up 42 at 82.35
September 20th, 2007 at 12:05 pmZ, Sam,
Impressive wave coming off Senegal. Here’s AccuW’s Henry Margusity take on the sub-tropical storm over FL:
As I explained yesterday, the system in the Gulf will most likely be classified as a subtropical storm in the next 24-36 hours. I think the fact is that the system is associated with a large upper-level low and the fact the system may have some characteristics of a cold core system. But the problem is that it really does not matter what they upgrade the system to, the impact of the weather will be the same. The Gulf Coast from the Florida Panhandle to will have gales and heavy rain. Most of the models are taking the system into Louisiana which seems reasonable given the overall pattern. They will be flying a recon plane into the the system today, so we may have a tropical depression by the end of the day.
“SAFETY PAYS”
September 20th, 2007 at 12:07 pmIt won’t be long Z before the reality hits the US indices. Nasdaq not buying into the rally you notice.
September 20th, 2007 at 12:17 pmNicky – I agree just not really seeing it yet although the indexes keep threatening and I suspect once they break the fall will be straight off a cliff.
September 20th, 2007 at 12:19 pmAm I the only one still scratching their head today?
September 20th, 2007 at 12:22 pmSane – about how many things. I’m confused about a lot. At least the Dow looks lower soon. And gas is rolling over although UNG could care less. And there’s lots more so no, you are not alone.
September 20th, 2007 at 12:24 pmNicky,
Do you follow the XLF? This index has been hugging 33 as a bottom for some time. Now it’s 35. The exodus of global retained earnings from the USD is scary.
Is this a short?
September 20th, 2007 at 12:26 pmLots of forex traders are scratching their heads.
ENT stopped divs two days ago. I have been nibling at Prime West. They already took back about a quarter of the mugging. This should be hitting the tar miners, not the diversifieds, who might get a tax break out of this. Looks overdone.
September 20th, 2007 at 12:28 pmSane – I’ve been scatching my head for 12 months. Now Nicky and Zman are smarter than me, but Energy, I think it’s holding up today, because the US dollar continues to fall. Overall market – “Praise tha lord and Ben Bernanke”, “Party like it’s 1999”, “Problems? What problems?”
September 20th, 2007 at 12:30 pmNG down 3%, UNG flat. What the?
September 20th, 2007 at 12:32 pmNevermind, the strip is up tiny, which is strange given NOAA forecast but oh well, will wait a little longer before closing out this loser to see if the strip will wake up and fall.
September 20th, 2007 at 12:36 pmThe weather is mugging you Z
September 20th, 2007 at 12:37 pmThe Soviet Socialistic Rebpublic of Alberta has titled the proposal ‘Our Fair Share.’ Here is the fairness
Tar 47% to 64%
Oil 44 to 49
NG 58 to 63
Sounds fair to me, but then I would vote for Hugy, if he ever allowed elections again.
September 20th, 2007 at 12:40 pmyep, that and oil
September 20th, 2007 at 12:42 pmAbout 15 billion of equity wiped out of the TSX and the Venture, I am guessing – fairly quickly.
September 20th, 2007 at 12:43 pmUnemployment in Alberta going to move up at a fair pace – and down in Saska in sequence. Waive goodbye to the heavy machinery heading east on the Trans-Canada, Minister Oberg.
September 20th, 2007 at 12:47 pmis ung supposed to track the underlying?
September 20th, 2007 at 12:47 pmyes, loosely
September 20th, 2007 at 12:48 pmto say the least. you must be pissed about your ung puts….
September 20th, 2007 at 12:49 pmalthough it looks like its continuing the downtrend it started in july
September 20th, 2007 at 12:50 pmyep, the strip is up slightly and they’re pricing off that presumably. The spread from Oct to Nov jumped by about 25% today. I’m waiting to see if a gap down bails me out in the morning at this point.
September 20th, 2007 at 12:51 pmWOW– canadian dollar at parity for the first time since i was negative 4 years old
September 20th, 2007 at 12:52 pmdid you just wake up tup?
September 20th, 2007 at 12:52 pmI usually don’t pin my hopes on a gap – too good to be true type of thing.
September 20th, 2007 at 12:54 pmCal – oh I know better. But the OII is more than offsetting the loss on the same weather. Still think the storm is all rain and no blow.
September 20th, 2007 at 12:55 pmBroader markets look in need of another move to the upside and then down they should come.
WTI – watching closely now. We have got our pop to a new high on Oct and Nov. Now they have to stay below 83.37 and 82.05…..
September 20th, 2007 at 12:56 pmSamborne – most definitely not smarter than you.
September 20th, 2007 at 12:58 pm$69 to 8/22/07 on $82.60 9/20/07 – pretty much straight up
yes, I puttered UNG, definitely me not smart as Sambone.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:00 pmN – I’m difinetly not the brigthest star in the heavens! LOL
September 20th, 2007 at 1:02 pm83
September 20th, 2007 at 1:04 pm83
September 20th, 2007 at 1:04 pm#137 error as we had not made new highs on the November contract but we have now.
News or expiry out of interest?
September 20th, 2007 at 1:05 pmNo news that I can see, Nicky
September 20th, 2007 at 1:08 pmcal- no had stuff to do in the AM
Z- what do you think of OII long here, or maybe when it come off the high of the day, and SU
September 20th, 2007 at 1:08 pmThis is off the topic, although Fuel Cell does use nat gas NOT hydrogen, with about double efficiency rate of conventional combustion. They just broke ten – uncharted territory. The enormous short position, about a quarter of the float, may be advantageous to the other side. Disclosure, I am long.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:09 pmTupp, I’m not adding to my calls.
SU I’m thinking short.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:09 pmOnly thing I can find news wise is MMS reporting 360,169 b/d oil, 1288 mmcf/d gas off line in GOMEX
September 20th, 2007 at 1:10 pmok tup, i have been in a rant about it all day – it is unbelievable.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:10 pmE&P and Majors not really buying into the crude price.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:11 pmZ, I don’t think they have been buying into the price as of late
September 20th, 2007 at 1:15 pmZ re #8– NXY is super globally diversified…. not that concentrated in ALTA
September 20th, 2007 at 1:18 pmcal you canadian too?
September 20th, 2007 at 1:18 pmoh do you stil have your OII calls?
September 20th, 2007 at 1:19 pmstill have the September 60s from mid August and the October 75s picked up on the 17th. š
September 20th, 2007 at 1:21 pmOil up 1.80, going for $85 today???!!!
September 20th, 2007 at 1:22 pmYea, I invested in all kinds of stuff in Albertastan.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:24 pmyea, the oil slick that lifts all boats. the canuxs took back most of comissar Oberg’s expropriation
September 20th, 2007 at 1:25 pmZ – Re 121 – Found this on the UNG website “The investment objective of UNG….that is the near month contract to expire, except when the near month contract is within two weeks of expiration, in which case it will be measured by the futures contract that is the next month contract to expire…” Is it tracking Nov. now?
September 20th, 2007 at 1:26 pmCal – “Albertastan”, your a “Funny guy”.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:28 pmJason, yes thanks, figured that out. And the Oct and Nov contracts decided to split company today.
Oct down 18
September 20th, 2007 at 1:28 pmNov up 8
83.77
September 20th, 2007 at 1:29 pmWow Ben better put that in his pipe and smoke it – wti at nearly 84!
September 20th, 2007 at 1:30 pmNG closing at 6 even (down 0.18), out months up 8 to 20 cents
Crude closing at 83.84 (up $1.91), strip not up quite half as much
September 20th, 2007 at 1:31 pmThe Saudis should put Ben in charge of OPEC
September 20th, 2007 at 1:32 pmCal
In your 146 comment “This is off the topic, although Fuel Cell does use nat gas NOT hydrogen, with about double efficiency rate of conventional combustion. “They” just broke ten – uncharted territory. The enormous short position, about a quarter of the float, may be advantageous to the other side. Disclosure, I am long.”
What company (They) are you refering to
September 20th, 2007 at 1:32 pmLooks like a blow off top to me. Nat gas refusing to join the party.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:33 pmWoot Woot
All aboard the inflation train.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:33 pmDow breaking down a little.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:36 pmSane – See #120, “Problems?, What problems?”
September 20th, 2007 at 1:39 pmBeating a dead horse: Nov NG was 30 cents lower this morning but it looks like it is the contract of choice to play this storm, thus the divergence in October and November. And why UNG is so strong.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:39 pmBrent makes new highs. Only distillates does not but its close.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:39 pmNymex Nov Crude Goes Positive; Storm In Background
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
September 20th, 2007 at 1:39 pmFrom MARKET TALK:
[Dow Jones] Nymex crude is choppy and the second month is strengthening a bit as weather forecasts call for the disturbance to the west of Florida to stay over water for longer than originally expected. The longer a storm stays over warm water, the more likely it is to attain tropical storm or hurricane strength. The system “will not likely be important,” says Tim Evans of Citigroup. “We have seen some production shut in for precaution but it will not become a major storm. I don’t think the oil market is particularly focused on the storm. It’s a background story.” Nymex Oct crude, which expires Thu, +46c at $82.38/bbl. Nov turns positive, now +3c at $80.88. (anna.raff@dowjones.com)
84.05
September 20th, 2007 at 1:45 pmFuel Cell = FCEL, located in Danbury,Connecticut, the former State Senate seat of Governor Jodi Rell, who is about to give them 70MW of mandated capacity in the state, which will put them on the big boys radar – let us hope.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:49 pmZ – who said I needed to buy particle board furniture craftsmen in China to hedge inflation when we got tar and methane right here.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:53 pmCal where are you from?
September 20th, 2007 at 1:54 pmNew Haven, Connecticut – the Elm City aka the model city.
speaking of the oil patch.. True just got beat like a rag doll on no news I see except as a sympathy beating along with the rest of Canada. Ok but half their prod is oil in Saska, including a steam upgrader AND they only get gas from Albertastan, avoiding the real shin kick that commisar Oberg gave to tar.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:58 pmDisclosure – I am long True.
September 20th, 2007 at 1:58 pmCal
Now that I reread your post it makes sense. I thought you were talking about Fuel Cell technology in general.
I, like you, think that this could be a huge game changer. I also beleive its closer than some think. If the final solution is using natural gas…then look out… demand will increase substantially. I would liken it to what happened to Corn/Ethanol. However, I think it will be much longer lasting because if it is as efficient as promised it could be the solution for the next 100 years completely replacing the Internal Combustion Engine.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:00 pmCNBC weather girl says 28% of ATLANTIC OIL AND GAS production shut in. Where do they find these people? MySpace? FaceBook?
September 20th, 2007 at 2:05 pmThere seems to be a disconnect between oil price and oil stocks. Anything oil today should be flying off the shelf. But it is not. Seems to me the only reason they(oil stocks) are holding up is because of oil prices. Other than that they would be down. If oil cracks it could be interesting. If I am missing something, please tell me. Opinions are invited.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:05 pmCNBC putting today’s rally down to the potential storm in the Gulf – what total BS. It ain’t even a tropical storm yet! The energy market survives a Code 5 storm and they think a tropical storm is going to cause that much damage? Speculation is all this is. First 10 bucks will come off in a heartbeat.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:06 pmNicky – amen
BigJim, – I think you’ve got it right
September 20th, 2007 at 2:07 pmNicky’s good buddy is quoted;
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aBaTJbgi9UJ4&refer=home
September 20th, 2007 at 2:10 pmFacebook – yes, that is where they find them. I was getting nightmares from the bimbo that comes on at 4 – kept reminding me of the smile a large mouth gives you when you pull the hook out.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:13 pmhe’s pointing to high oil and saying it’s a re evaluation of how much the housing market crisis was going to effect oil demand and therefore this move is justified ?!
He was a bear not 2 weeks ago!!! What a waffler. Nicky, you got to get a some new friends, lol!
Cal – roflmao!
Out for 20 minutes.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:14 pmZ – Since I don’t watch the “Talking Heads”, why do you call them the “Weather Girls”?
Big – This oil market is being run by the “Crowd”. It’s all speculation, nothing else. When they exit all boats will go down, including the oil stocks, etc. So I agree with you.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:15 pmdollar down – oil up. storm, what storm.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:16 pmZ – PF, That’s why I love the guy, reminds me of Cramer. Very entertaining.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:16 pmoil costs the same as it did yesterday – but the greenback in your pockets just got lighter
September 20th, 2007 at 2:17 pmNICKY – Why are you a fan of PF?
September 20th, 2007 at 2:18 pmSambone – they get all giddy standing in front of a big chart point to it and babbling what someone else just told them, getting it half wrong, and it just reminds me of the old days when non-meteorology types like Vanna White explained the weather to you back in the 70s by saying, “and then this big thing here is going to swooop in bringing lots of wind so get out your kites and sun will smile on us by the weekend, over to you sports guy”
September 20th, 2007 at 2:19 pmRam – It’s me, just joking around. Nicky can’t stand the guy.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:22 pmRam- I can’t stand him! They are being sarcastic because they know this. All he does is ramp the market.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:22 pmCNBC showing Oct wti contract down big time into settlement. ie 70 odd bucks from the close. Is this right? My charts stop updating at the close on expiry day.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:25 pmThanks everyone for your opinions.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:25 pmIt’s best to turn the volume down and pay attention to the things that matter when Erin is on.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:25 pmthis has to be a joke: my chart now showing october crude down 522!
September 20th, 2007 at 2:30 pmN – Mine is showing currently $83.32, up 1.39
September 20th, 2007 at 2:35 pmOKAY.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:36 pmattempt at TA!:
The fact that Oct expired taking out 83.37 is a bit of a problem. (wave iii cannot be the shortest which it would be). However November is still intact as it is still below 82.05. Distillates, RBOB (for this wave) and Brent all posted higher highs. October spiking above 83.37 could be an anomaly if everything turns down in short order. WTI trading under today’s lows of 80.27 will say the top is in.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:43 pmSamborne – even that is well below the closing highs.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:44 pmbought USO Oct 62 puts at $1.85
September 20th, 2007 at 2:46 pmnice idea kaman
September 20th, 2007 at 2:47 pmZ – Off subject, almost “Tini time” Roger that!
How’d you do Saturday? Did you limit out?
September 20th, 2007 at 2:55 pmSaw no geese. Shot the only dove we saw. Lame.
September 20th, 2007 at 2:57 pmBeen there, done that!
September 20th, 2007 at 2:58 pmmay bag some squirrels tonight.
September 20th, 2007 at 3:00 pm